Ok cool, best of luck with the data dump. Given how there are already a couple flash tunes out there in EU, there are a couple of people that've already reverse engineered the code enough to get a favorable result. Just keep in mind that the way the strategy is written is a collection of formulas and only a few lookup tables. It's far different and more complicated than what most aftermarket tuners are used to looking at. Add in the Valvetronic operation and the whole thing over most [all] tuners heads.
The easiest solution would be to raise the torque target at high load. There really isn't a boost target table anymore, it's just a resultant solution of one of the formulas, of which torque target is the main factor. The piggyback boxes attenuate the MAP signal to trick the formula to give more boost. To give a very broad non-realistic idea of how the formula looks:
Actual load = ECT * IAT * oil temp * baro * TIP * MAF * TMAP * cat temp * et cetera / requested load = wastegate PWM
To change gears, AFR is a mostly separate situation, but fairly straightforward. It's going to look at all the temps and the torque output, and then position the lambda accordingly. The super quick datalogging I've done so far show the car is Lambda 1.0 most of the time. Fuel cut on no load decel of course, and then full load tapers from 1.0 at lower RPM and temps to 0.88 at higher RPM and/or temps. This is a fairly typical strategy for current closed loop WBO2 setups.
--->what do you mean by "low excess fuel"? "Fixing" the consumption sounds illogical given how incredible the OEM fueling control is. Please elaborate.